close

How Exercise Physiology Is Reshaping Cancer Rehabilitation

Cancer rehabilitation is moving beyond recovery from surgery or treatment-related symptoms. Increasingly, care teams are assessing how physical activity, resistance training, aerobic conditioning, mobility work, and behaviour support can help people maintain function throughout the cancer experience.

Exercise physiologists are becoming important members of this multidisciplinary model. Their role involves matching safe, evidence-based exercise to a person’s diagnosis, treatment stage, symptoms, preferences, and broader health needs. In Queensland, research translation networks such as Brisbane Diamantina Health Partners help connect researchers, clinicians, universities, and health services so that evidence can influence everyday care.

This shift reflects a wider understanding of cancer survivorship. Rehabilitation may begin before treatment, continue through chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and extend into long-term recovery. The aim is to support strength, independence, confidence, participation, and quality of life while recognising that each patient’s pathway is different.

From Research Evidence To Routine Care

Research has linked appropriately prescribed exercise with improved physical function, reduced cancer-related fatigue, better mood, and greater tolerance of daily activities. Exercise may also help people manage treatment side effects such as deconditioning, sleep disruption, reduced balance, and loss of muscle mass.

Translating these findings into clinical practice requires more than publishing positive results. Health services need referral criteria, trained professionals, screening tools, documentation systems, and clear communication between oncologists, nurses, physiotherapists, exercise physiologists, dietitians, psychologists, and primary care providers.

Cancer rehabilitation pathways are therefore being designed around coordinated decisions. A patient may be referred after a functional assessment, during a treatment planning appointment, or when fatigue and reduced mobility begin to interfere with work, family responsibilities, or self-care.

How Exercise Is Tailored During Treatment

Exercise prescription in oncology is highly individualised. An exercise physiologist may adjust intensity according to blood counts, treatment-related neuropathy, bone involvement, cardiovascular risk, pain, wound healing, previous activity levels, and the person’s goals. A programme might include walking, cycling, resistance exercises, breathing work, stretching, or balance training.

The timing of exercise is equally important. Someone preparing for major surgery may benefit from prehabilitation that builds aerobic capacity and strength. During active treatment, the focus may shift to maintaining function and managing fatigue. After treatment, structured rehabilitation can support return to work, community participation, recreational activity, and long-term disease management.

Remote and community-based options are also expanding access. Supervised telehealth sessions, home-based programmes, hospital gyms, and local exercise facilities can complement specialist services. These models are particularly valuable for people living far from tertiary cancer centres or managing transport, employment, caring, or financial barriers.

Measuring Outcomes That Matter To Patients

Successful integration depends on measuring more than attendance. Clinical teams may track walking capacity, strength, balance, falls risk, fatigue, pain, treatment interruptions, physical activity levels, and health-related quality of life. Patient-reported outcomes help show whether rehabilitation is improving the activities and roles that matter in daily life.

Research translation also benefits from consumer and community involvement. People affected by cancer can identify practical barriers that may be missed in a clinic or laboratory, including concerns about safety, cultural suitability, cost, language, privacy, and the emotional experience of exercising after diagnosis. The principles described in consumer-informed research can help services design more relevant pathways.

Pathway stage Exercise physiology focus Example outcomes
Before treatment Prehabilitation, education, baseline assessment Greater fitness, surgical readiness, confidence
During treatment Symptom-responsive movement and strength work Preserved function, reduced fatigue, safer activity
Early recovery Progressive conditioning and mobility Improved independence, balance, and daily activity
Long-term survivorship Sustainable physical activity and risk management Quality of life, participation, ongoing wellbeing

Connecting Physical And Psychological Recovery

Cancer rehabilitation addresses emotional wellbeing as well as physical capacity. Fear of recurrence, low mood, anxiety, altered body image, social isolation, and uncertainty can reduce motivation and make exercise feel inaccessible. A supportive programme uses realistic goals, encouragement, education, and referrals to psychological or social services when needed.

This integrated approach aligns with broader health translation work. For example, the young people’s mental health case study illustrates how evidence can be adapted into practical services that respond to lived experience. Cancer rehabilitation can apply a similar principle by embedding exercise within a network of psychosocial and clinical support rather than treating it as a separate appointment.

Exercise professionals also help patients rebuild trust in their bodies. Gradual progress, symptom monitoring, and shared decision-making can reduce fear of movement. Group sessions may provide social connection, while individual programmes allow closer attention to complex medical needs.

Building Pathways Across Health Services

For exercise physiology research to become routine care, referral pathways must be visible and consistent. Electronic medical records can include prompts for functional screening, treatment teams can identify referral points, and discharge plans can specify who will coordinate rehabilitation after hospital care ends.

Partnerships between cancer centres, universities, community providers, primary care, and research organisations support this continuity. They can help test models of care, evaluate cost and access, train the workforce, and identify which services produce meaningful outcomes for different cancer populations.

Governance and ethics are also central. Exercise programmes must use appropriate risk screening, informed consent, clinical escalation procedures, and data protection. Research findings should be interpreted carefully so that recommendations remain safe for people with advanced disease, complex comorbidities, or treatment complications.

Priorities For Stronger Implementation

Health services can accelerate the integration of exercise physiology by focusing on practical systems as well as scientific evidence. Useful priorities include:

  • Create routine exercise and function screening at key points across the cancer pathway.
  • Establish direct referral routes between oncology teams, exercise physiologists, physiotherapists, and community providers.
  • Fund supervised and low-cost options for people facing transport, geographic, cultural, or financial barriers.
  • Use patient-reported outcomes alongside clinical measures to evaluate quality of life and participation.
  • Involve consumers, carers, and communities in programme design, research priorities, and service evaluation.

Education for clinicians is another important requirement. Oncologists, nurses, and allied health professionals need confidence in discussing physical activity, recognising red flags, and explaining when specialist exercise support is appropriate. Exercise physiologists, in turn, need access to current oncology education and clear escalation pathways.

Implementation research can reveal why a programme succeeds in one setting but struggles in another. Factors such as staffing, referral culture, gym access, digital literacy, cultural safety, and local transport all shape uptake. Continuous evaluation allows services to refine delivery while protecting the core principles of safe, personalised rehabilitation.

The future of cancer care will increasingly measure recovery by what people can do, how they feel, and whether they can participate in the lives they value. Exercise physiology research provides the evidence and clinical expertise to make that vision practical. Health services, researchers, consumers, and community partners can help embed these pathways by sharing knowledge, testing accessible models, and supporting translation from discovery to care. Explore the work of Brisbane Diamantina Health Partners and connect with initiatives that are helping turn cancer rehabilitation evidence into better experiences and outcomes.

Our Partners